Rear-end collisions involving cars are common. Invariably,the car that bangs into another car’s rear is at fault. It is considered so because a motorist behind another vehicle on the road is expected to maintain enough distance from the vehicle in front. This distance helps a car avoid a collision when the vehicle in the front slows down or stops abruptly.
Once the accident happens and the damage has been ascertained,it isn’t that difficult thereafter to figure out who banged into whom. However,car accident claim complications could arise when more than two vehicles are involved. In such a scenario,determining fault wouldn’t be easy anymore.
For example,let’s assume there is a three-vehicle chain. The vehicle in the middle stops or slows down significantly. The third vehicle’s driver is on his mobile phone and did not notice the middle vehicle slowing down. Not noticing it in time,the third vehicle strikes the middle vehicle,which then bangs into the first vehicle. In such a scenario,it wouldn’t be right to blame the middle car’s driver for the damage done to the first car.
Another scenario,as described bySC, could be the first vehicle not having functioning brake lights. As a result,the driver of the car in the middle may not be warned in time about the first car slowing down or halting. In this scenario,the blame would fall partially on the driver ahead.
One more situation could be the brakes of the third car failing due to a manufacturing defect,causing the vehicle to bump into the car in front. This would lead to the manufacturer being sued. However,there could be multiple defenses for having slowed down below the minimum speed limit.
Long story short,just because you rammed into a vehicle from behind doesn’t automatically make you the guilty party. It’s always recommended to seek legal advice from ahttps://www.expertlaw.com/profile/john-hawkins to know where you truly stand.